|Statement||J.G. Bolten, S.A. Resetar.|
|Series||Rand note -- N-2387-EPRI, Rand publications series|
|Contributions||Resetar, S. A., Electric Power Research Institute.|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||xvi, 102 p. :|
|Number of Pages||102|
This report is the fifth in a series dealing with the human health risks of toxic substances emitted by coal-fired power plants. It summarizes two earlier studies that examined selenium and beryllium discharges from a power plant in Pennsylvania (the Montour Steam Electric Station operated by Pennsylvania Power and Light Company).Author: Joseph G. Bolten, Paul F. Morrison, Kathleen A. Wolf, Susan A. Resetar. Ecological basis for regulating aquatic emissions from the power industry: The case with selenium. Health and environmental implications of trace metals released from coal-fired power plants: an assessment study of the situation in the European Community. Beryllium emissions from a coal‐fired power plant. Journal of Environmental Cited by: The general framework and computer program are applied to illustrative case studies of coal-fired power plant emissions of arsenic and selenium. The problem of uncertainty in the results is discussed and several potential analysis approaches evaluated. A selected approach to uncertainty analysis is applied to the case by: 3. primarily in certain industries. Coal mine run-off, refinery wastewater, irrigation districts with high Selenium deposits, and coal-fired power plants. Selenium Chemistry Selenate has a valence of +6 and is very soluble. Selenate is the most common form of Selenium in wastewater.
The MW power plant fueled by lignite located in Thailand is demonstrated in this study. Emissions of mercury from the coal-ﬁred power plant are calculated under 3 major scenarios. The ﬁrst scenario is the amount of mercury released under the existing operation of the power plant. Gradient was asked to conduct a case study assessment of air quality and public health claims related to stack emissions from certain coal-fired power plants (CFPPs). Four Ameren Missouri CFPPs in the St. Louis area were selected for the case study assessment, including the 2,MW Labadie Plant in. With an increased number of coal-fired plants, CO 2 discharge and emissions can be reduced, even with an increase of electric power generation in the US by 38% over the next 20 years. Even though the book concentrates on pulverized coal-fired power plants, it also discusses and compares other options like fluidized-bed combustion and coal. 2. Process description of a coal-fired power plant A coal-fired power plant burns coal to produce electricity. In a typical coal-fired plant, there are pulverisers to mill the coal to a fine powder for burning in a combustion chamber of the boiler. The heat produced from the burning of the coal generates steam at high temperature and pressure.
A companion document, A Case Study of Selenium Emissions from a Coal-Fired Power Plant (NEPRI), described the application of the WTRISK computer program to a real case study of selenium emissions from an existing coal-fired power plant in eastern Pennsylvania. Prior to the study mandated by the Clean Air Act Amendments of , EPA had evaluated the risks from, and need for regulation of, radionuclide emissions from coal-fired power plants at roughly five-year intervals going back to Each time, EPA had concluded that regulation was not necessary to protect public health. ESPs are capable of removing up to % of the dust in the combustion gases from a coal-fired power station. However, even with these facilities, coal-fired power plants can still release significant quantities of both PM 10 and PM emissions. There are normally no particulate removal systems on natural gas-fired power plants. In the current research, Industrial Source Complex Short-Term 3 (ISCST3) tool has been used for simulation of nonlinear advection–diffusion governing differential equation with appropriate boundary condition for prediction of ground-level concentrations of pollutant emission from a coal-fired power plant in Angul, India.